I've finally finished my critique of Hoppe's argumentation ethics as well as Kinsella's
estoppel approach. (It's not really a critique per se, but a subtle yet
important reconstruction.) I got busy so I hadn't had time to finish
editing it, but I've been wanting to show it to the world for the longest time. I think even Murphy and Callahan will like it.
That will be Part II and will be published in a few days. It follows this essay in which I discuss what I think is faulty
about why Hoppe thinks his ethic (and more widely, praxeology itself) is
true, as well as the problems his argument has with regard to actors
mutually recognizing their respective property rights:
Read Ultimate Foundation of Private Property, Part I: Argumentation Ethics.
No comments:
Post a Comment